These self-serving double-standards could even explain the common feeling that incivility is on the increase — recent research showed how we view the same acts of rudeness far more harshly when they are committed by strangers than by our friends or ourselves. We are all potential trolls Unfortunately, as anyone who has found themselves in a spat on Twitter will attest, social media may be magnifying some of the worst aspects of human nature, no doubt in part due to the online disinhibition effect , and the fact that anonymity easy to achieve online is known to increase our inclinations for immorality.
Of course this implies that initial trolling by a few can cause a snowball of increasing negativity, which is exactly what the researchers found when they studied reader discussion on CNN.
- You are here.
- Get smart. Sign up for our email newsletter..
- See a Problem?.
- The bad news on human nature, in 10 findings from psychology | Aeon Ideas.
- Diversity of Human Natures | BioScience | Oxford Academic;
- The bad news on human nature, in 10 findings from psychology.
- From Toussaint to Tupac: The Black International since the Age of Revolution;
We favour ineffective leaders with psychopathic traits One way for us to mitigate against our human failings would be if we were inclined to choose leaders with rare virtuousness and skill. Sadly, we seem to have the opposite knack. Consider for a moment President Donald Trump. In fairness, there have been some null and contradictory findings on this topic too, but a meta-analysis an overview of prior evidence published this summer concluded there is indeed a modest but significant link between trait psychopathy and leadership emergence, and that this has practical implications — especially since psychopathy also correlates with poorer leadership performance.
Does this matter for the future of our species? Are we doomed? One comforting caveat — most of the dating research relevant to that last item was based on European American samples and may not generalise to other cultures in fact a study out this year found that among Asian Americans, it was those men and women with more pro-social traits who were more successful at speed dating. In fact, it is arguably by acknowledging and understanding our shortcomings that we can more successfully overcome them and so cultivate the better angels of our nature.
On which note, remember to hang tight for the sequel to this post that will detail 10 findings showcasing the brighter, more uplifting aspects of humankind. Its interesting being as the child doesnt know good nor bad and is thus taught it…Through actions of their enviroment. Normally parents who havent a clue how to behave. Like Like. Surely a child will know good and bad? They will know that causing physical pain to others is bad.
This is not believable. And why on earth would anyone regard spending time in their own thoughts as unpleasant? I have spent a great deal of my life doing precisely this. Instead, people judge and project onto others. Allegedly it is what they project that is an issue in themselves they refuse to own and address.
Unfortunately, judging and projecting is addictive and becomes a natural thing many people never evolve from. And why too do people think that everyone is or should be just like them? But then this whole article is full of subjective double entendres. Do you know people with depression, suicidal thoughts, anxiety?
For some of them just thinking alone could be the worst horror. Not many people like to think ,or even know how. That is why we have to have music everywhere we go,and people are glued to their phones. It is also a spiritual truth. Anthony Bloom once said that no one wants to spend even five minutes truly alone with himself. Hard for those of us with contemplative natures to understand for sure! The article is not about you but rather based on studies.
Anecdotal evidence is not science.
Your human nature is getting in your way. Seems to me that a good proportion of us are innately nasty, that is we are born nasty.
1. Who are we? Belief, evolution, and our place in the world
However, we learn to become actors and many of us behave appropriately even if innately nasty. Some of are born good, but probably less than those that are born bad. Like Liked by 1 person. One would have liked to see a more balanced discussion where evidence of the influence of nurturing on behavior and the resultant personality traits is also presented. Indeed the Nature-Nurture debate jas long been settled. Whatever the proportion of positive and negatlve traits is a reflection of thevtype of socialization such individuals were exposed to.
You must be a Sociologist. Besides, if you had read the entire article the author promised a counter-point in part two of the series. Perhaps Ms. Jarrett is right. Perhaps her list is the worse of human nature. However, her list IS human nature. I worry when psychologists try to take basic human nature and turn it into an illness to cure.
Nature Human Behaviour
Like Liked by 2 people. Beyond that, it must be taken into account that the human being is a being anchored in his time and context, that is, a historical being, in that sense, the average people of industrialized countries are described, it is a reality there, not necessarily everywhere and not in all social classes. All of these human traits have been recognized and well understood for 10, years. Thank goodness we now have academic studies to prove what we already know! If we did, parenting would only need to be a passive excercise. Instead, with a lot of hard work, guidance and a bit of luck you probably will end up with a reasonably nice, somewhat empathetic human being, but one who is nevertheless self interested more than altruistic.
Describes most of us, no? Which is just fine. I refer to them as Neanderthals. Long ago they raped homo sapiens. With that we allegedly became more resilient to viruses and such. Biggest human illusion and joke EVER. Among the eclectic issues covered are the big-picture themes listed above, together with a host of subthemes: the emergence of consciousness; how microbes can evolve far more rapidly that humans, and hence the scope of new pandemic diseases; why and how our ancestors developed agriculture, writing, governance, gunpowder, industry, nation-states, art, and religion; chance in human history; the notion of free will; the role of altruism; environmental ethics; the sources of human values; how sexism, stress behavior, and overconsumption may reflect our evolutionary past; and our environmental predicament in the form of grand-scale soil erosion, water shortages, deforestation, biodepletion, climate change, and so on.
In a concluding chapter, Ehrlich considers how we can develop rational strategies to deal with a multitude of social, political, and environmental problems. He addresses such issues as genetic engineering, pollution, overuse of antibiotics, crop pest control, biodiversity conservation, and establishment of equitable societies. All these topics are germane to our environmental predicament, and indeed to our future outlook as societies.
We must manage our biosphere as a single continuum: The winds carry no passport. Thus there is a premium on learning to think global. But alas, and as the opening sentence of the Brundtland Commission's report told us 15 years ago with all too little response , our earth is one, our world is not.
We seek to run the biosphere in management packages known as nation-states, which hardly show the collaborative spirit that is objectively required. Do our limited perceptions stem from our evolutionary background? For the great bulk of Homo sapiens' history, people operated in small bands of perhaps 50 hunter-gatherers.
Subscribe to our mailing list
There was a selection benefit in identifying with the whole group, because doing so would increase one's chances of staying alive and passing on both one's genes and one's cultural information. Then, 10, years ago, the group expanded to a village of maybe people. After a while the village gave way to a township of 50, people, then a city of , people, then a city-state of 5 million people, and so on. At each stage the successful members enlarged their sense of loyalty to encompass a larger community. Can we expand our capacity for fealty to make the last and biggest leap—to identify with the entire world and the entire earth?
Idealistic as it may sound, it is realistic: Nothing less will work. Of course, global-scale fealty does not mean any reduced loyalty to smaller communities; during the Sydney Olympics I cheered for the British athletes to run the socks off the rest. The challenge should rank as the most taxing and rewarding in the history of humanity. Consider too what is emerging as surely the number one problem in conjunction with population growth that environmentalists, and indeed society as a whole, must tackle: namely, consumption.
- Human nature: Six things we all do | New Scientist;
- Why We Believe: Evolution, Making Meaning, and the Development of Human Natures;
- Aeon for Friends.
Until very recent times humans have believed that more of anything must be better, virtually by definition. The overriding preoccupation has been getting supper on the table and supplying other essentials. The profoundly held perceptions of , generations must be rejigged in a couple of generations.
We could find many a clue on how to set about this formidable task by pondering Ehrlich's book. Some observers assert that consumption patterns are set in concrete. But note that some 60 million Americans have given up smoking in little over a decade. At the start of that period the ubiquitous message was that, if you wanted to be accepted, you should smoke.
By the end of the period, the reverse applied.
6 characteristics that define human nature
The switch made for a social earthquake, virtually overnight. Though Ehrlich has often been viewed as the ultimate doomster and gloomster, his book is inherently optimistic. He sees stacks of scope for us to improve our condition, doing it from the inside out—which means that, for a start, we should conceptually recognize that we have been molded in part by all manner of external pressures.
Reflecting the vast variety of human culture, Ehrlich emphasizes, are the advances made in difficult areas such as human rights, individual freedoms, democratic governance, race relations, religious tolerance, women's rights, and avoidance of global conflict. With all this progress to date, Ehrlich contends that we can aim for still greater cultural advances. We should view ourselves not just as human beings but as human becomings. The book will appeal to practitioners in evolution, genetics, paleontology, anthropology, sociobiology, and psychology, as well as governance, jurisprudence, esthetics, ethics, and philosophy.
Wilson's recent book Consilience. Moreover, Ehrlich's view of the world and its peoples is presented with the wit and panache that have been hallmarks of Ehrlich's writings for decades. The ,word text is followed by pages of notes and over references. A bravura performance.